Proskauer Rose LLP - Kenneth Rubenstein, MPEG LA - Judge Jorge Labarga - Iviewt Theft - Proskauer Rose Perjury - Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

Proskauer Rose Attorney - Proof of Corruption and Coverups in Iviewit Stolen Technology

2962003 10 30 Department of Justice complaint filed against Rubenstein and others for antitrust violations including their MPEGLA patent pooling scheme and claims that the DOJ approved the scheme.
2972003 10 30 Department of Justice complaint filed against Rubenstein and others for antitrust violations including their MPEGLA patent pooling scheme and claims that the DOJ approved the scheme.

304
2003 11 17 - Final Judgment against Iviewit in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case. Judgment was issued by Judge Jorge Labarga, after he cancelled the first trial with no notice to Iviewit or either of their law firms, Selz & Muvdi and Schiffrin & Barroway. At the rescheduling hearing both Schiffrin & Barroway and Selz Muvdi withdrew as counsel stating the other would be handling the case. Labarga let both go instead, despite the fact that Schiffrin & Barroway had signed a binding LOU/Legal Retainer agreement to represent Iviewit at the case. This forced Iviewit to have no counsel and days later Labarga ruled a default on Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel. Iviewit could not find counsel that fast in a almost three year case and Schiffrin and Selz refused to turn over necessary files needed to find new counsel or file an appeal.

305
2003 11 17 - Final Judgment against Iviewit in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case. Judgment was issued by Judge Jorge Labarga, after he cancelled the first trial with no notice to Iviewit or either of their law firms, Selz & Muvdi and Schiffrin & Barroway. At the rescheduling hearing both Schiffrin & Barroway and Selz Muvdi withdrew as counsel stating the other would be handling the case. Labarga let both go instead, despite the fact that Schiffrin & Barroway had signed a binding LOU/Legal Retainer agreement to represent Iviewit at the case. This forced Iviewit to have no counsel and days later Labarga ruled a default on Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel. Iviewit could not find counsel that fast in a almost three year case and Schiffrin and Selz refused to turn over necessary files needed to find new counsel or file an appeal.
300
2003 11 10 - The Florida Bar letter response refusing to start investigation of Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer and his bar complaint.

301
2003 11 10 - The Florida Bar letter response refusing to start investigation of Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer and his bar complaint.
Source of Proskauer Rose - iViewit Post
http://www.deniedpatent.com/search/label/Proskauer%20Rose%20LLP

Proskauer Rose Lawyers involved in 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft. Proskauer Ross LLP Steals Technology. Proskauer Rose Causes Massive Shareholder Fraud. Proskauer Rose Lies. Proskauer Rose Attorney Commits Perjury.

"2002 10 16 Notice of Appeal on Jorge Labarga case.


1962002 10 25 Kenneth Rubenstein sworn statement to Judge Jorge Labarga trying to get out of his deposition and claiming he does not know anything about Iviewit.


1972002 10 25 Kenneth Rubenstein statement to Judge Jorge Labarga, complete false statements to avoid a deposition at his law firms lawsuit against Iviewit for a bill.


1982002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein full deposition with Exhibits CERT. I KNOW NOTHING!


1992002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein deposition regarding his being unsure a conflict check was done by Proskauer. This would have prevented MPEGLA from using the Iviewit processes disclosed to Rubenstein as Iviewit patent counsel, while he was a founder and patent counsel & reviewer for MPEGLA LLC

2002002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein deposition statement that he does not have Iviewit patent documents = Contradictory evidence is a letter showing Christopher Wheeler sending him the entire Iviewit Patent Portfolio.

2012002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition stating he does not know about the video inventions = Contradictory evidence shows that Wheeler was sent video invention disclosures and then later in his deposition he claims to have been at video disclosure meeting with Intel and Real3D engineers.
2022002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition does not know about video invention.
203"2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition regarding no conflicts check, neither him or Kenneth Rubenstein are sure a conflicts check was ever done.

2042002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition statement that Iviewit was a portal, he didn't know about the technologies and that Proskauer was hired for portal services and not to patent the inventions. Contradictory evidence is overwhelming.


2052002 11 21 Wheeler deposition statement that no Proskauer conflict of interest check was done.

2062002 11 21 Wheeler deposition statement that Proskauer and Christopher Wheeler represented Brian G. Utley in the past. They failed to disclose that this former work by Proskauer and Wheeler was for a company where stolen patents went at Utley's former employer. Contradictory evidence = Wheeler's statements under deposition and to the Florida Bar that conflict, constituting perjury. Also, Utley states in deposition that Wheeler never did work for him. "Who's on first."

2072002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition stating Proskauer never opined on the technologies or had anything to do with patents. Contradictory evidence = Wheeler/Proskauer patent opinions for the investors. Wachovia Private Placement showing Wheeler and Rubenstein on the Board of Directors and claiming Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer are retained patent counsel.

2122003 01 28 Proskauer v. Iviewit, Judge Jorge Labarga, Counter Complaint was filed but Labarga refused it claiming attorneys that were initially found representing Iviewit with no authority basically waived any rights to such. It was not learned until much later that the suit involved fraudulent companies set up by Proskauer with stolen intellectual properties in them and that the suit was part of a scheme with a fraudulent federal bankruptcy filing, to seize the patents in a shell game.

2132003 01 31 Eliot Bernstein deposition, this document is well worth the read as Eliot Bernstein deposes the deposition takers from Proskauer, note, Proskauer is continuously representing themselves in all lawsuits and all bar complaints.

2142003 02 25 Raymond Joao 9th district original attorney misconduct complaint - somehow gets transferred to the wrong district, the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee for prosecution with the Proskauer attorney misconduct complaints, although Joao is registered elsewhere.

2152003 02 26 Original attorney misconduct complaint against Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein filed at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.

2162003 02 26 Original Rubenstein Bar Action

2172003 02 26 Original Florida Bar Complaint against Proskauer and Christopher Wheeler.

218

2003 03 20 Judge Jorge Labarga Court Order for Kenneth Rubenstein and Christopher Wheeler to return to take further deposition to answer previously unanswered questions that they tried to refuse to come back too after being caught lying and perjuring themselves in the first part. The trial is thrown before they can be deposed again. 

2192003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler perjured statement to the Florida Bar regarding Brian G. Utley. Wheeler in a footnote in a response tries to minimize the extent of the lie he is caught in. 

220

2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler perjured Florida Bar statement. Florida Bar while cognizant of the crime of perjury in an official proceeding fails to take any action, although Wheeler is caught beyond a reasonable doubt and apologizes for his lies in writing. Oh yeah, the President of the Florida Bar turns out to be Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler, underling at the law firm of Broad and Cassel and fails to disclose such while receiving documents from Iviewit to investigate.

2212003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer's response to the bar complaint which is tendered by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who acted in violation of his public office with the Florida Supreme Court agency The Florida Bar.

2222003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer's response to The Florida Bar bar complaint which was tendered by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who acted in conflict of interest and violation of public office with his Supreme Court of Florida Bar Position.

2232003 04 08 Raymond Joao's response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions. Coocoo.

2242003 04 08 Raymond Joao's response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions. Coocoo.

2252003 04 11 - Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer's response to the bar complaint filed at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee authored by Proskauer Rose attorney Steven C. Krane, who acted in conflict of interest and violation of public offices with the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and also in violation of his role as former President of the NY Bar Association precluding him from handling any bar complaints within a one year blackout and where he had personal and professional interests he also violated his ethics. This sucks for like the guy who parades around as being an ethics leader, saddest day in the life of Socrates, rollin' in his grave.

2262003 04 11 - Kenneth Rubenstein response authored by Proskauer attorney Steven C. Krane. Krane was former New York State Bar Association President and former law clerk to New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Krane was clerk for Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye who is also in conflict and abuse of public office as Kaye is married to a Porksour partner, who recently died, Stephen R. Kaye and Judith failed to take any actions when notified of the crimes in the courts she oversees!!!!!

2272003 04 16 Supreme Court of New York First Department Disciplinary Committee regarding reply to Raymond Joao complaint.

2003 09 19 Motion for mistrial in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case based on the insane actions of Judge Jorge Labarga.

282
2003 09 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline written statement to Harry I Moatz, Director of the OED. Corrected.

283
2003 09 23 Virginia Bar Complaint filed against William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner for Dick's patent crimes.

284
2003 09 25 Certified letter to Harry I. Moatz and William Dick.

285
2003 09 26 - Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar, that civil case was over which is why the failed to investigate originally, although Florida Bar rules prohibit delaying investigation into bar complaints because of civil cases.

286
2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter that was lost for months regarding holding off investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel. 

287
2003 10 02 - Letter to Florida Bar - Missing

288
2003 10 02 - Letter to Florida Bar - Not Signed Missing Exhibits

289
2003 10 02 Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar to re-file the complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler as the civil litigation was completed.

290
2003 10 02 Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar to re-file the complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler as the civil litigation was completed.
Source of Proskauer Rose Post

http://www.deniedpatent.com/search/label/Proskauer%20Rose%20LLP

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Eye on Proskauer Rose

Proskauer Rose LLP, Robert J. Kafin - Securities Fraud - USPTO Fraud - Shareholder Fraud - Anti-Trust Violations - Proskauer Rose Law Firm - Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Sucks - Proskauer Rose Corruption

Proskauer Rose Law Firm - RICO Complaint Proskauer Rose

Patent & Copyright Misappropriations

•Co-Directs Frauds: USPTO; EPO; JPO;
Wachovia Securities Fraud;
Iviewit Shareholder Fraud;

•Contributory Antitrust Violations

•Co-Directs RICO Violations

•Tortuous Interference with Business Relationships

•Conflicts of Interest

For More Affiliations, Conflicts of Interest Click on Link Below.

Link to Source Of this Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/KAFIN.htm

Proskauer Rose Law Firm - Proskauer Rose

Crystal L. Cox 

Investigative Blogger

Crystal@CrystalCox.com 

Eye on Proskauer Rose Law Firm - Proskauer Rose

Proskauer Rose - Perjured Deposition by Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein - MPEG LA Corrupt Patent Pooling.

Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt Patent Attorney from Proskauer Rose LLP - Working with MPEG LA. Kenneth Rubenstein Perjured himself in Depositions Regarding the Iviewit Technologies Patents in Which Kenneth Rubenstein was Directly Involved in Derailing the Rightful Inventors to Getting their Rightful Patent.

MPEG LA - with the Help of Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney, Pooled the Technology in patents and well the Iviewit Inventors NEVER got rights or any compensation for the Mult-Trillion Dollar Invention that WE ALL USE.


Part 1


Part 2


Part 3


Part 4


Part 5


Part 6 - Final

www.Iviewit.TV
For More on Iviewit

www.ProskauerSucks.com
more on Proskauer Rose Corruption

http://www.kennethrubenstein.com/
more on MPEG LA Corruption and Kenneth Rubenstein
Corrupt Patent Attorney.

posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

MPEG LA, LLC - Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney - MPEG LA Stole iViewit Technology and Illegally Patent Pooled the Technology.

Kenneth Rubenstein to this day, covers up the FACT that he helped MPEG LA get control of the Iviewit Technology and illegally put this Patent into patent pools.

Kenneth Rubenstein is So Far above the LAW as protected by Judicial Corruption in New York. Kenneth Rubenstein was long since protected by Corrupt Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye who protected her then husband Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose Partner.

Here are Some Documents on Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose.

1999 03 02 Kenneth Rubenstein letter to inventor Bernstein regarding how to do patents. Rubenstein states in deposition that he does not know Bernstein, never spoke with him and that he knew nothing about the inventions.

1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation a company that disappears although bills are generated through it.

Kenneth Rubenstein Starts Patent Pool

Kenneth Rubenstein - Above the Law Click Here

Proskauer Rose Connections - Crime Chart - Click Here

2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as patent counsel for an SBA Compliance Request for Crossbow SBIC Loans. This completely contradicts Utley Rubenstein and Wheeler deposition statements whereby they claim Rubenstein was never an Advisor, patent counsel and that he was not on Board.

1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist or perhaps it is another Proskauer owned entity involved in theft of the patents through a complex shell game with identically named and similarly named companies

1999 01 28 Letter from Iviewit to Albert Gortz of Proskauer Rose asking why Kenneth Rubenstein was not at Proskauer Rose as was told to Iviewit Shareholders and instead was found to be at Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel.

1999 02 17 - Interactive Week article where Intel engineers are quoted as stating the Internet, at speeds under 1.5Mbps, would be text based with banners, no video or imaging of quality at the lower bandwidths.

1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler letter regarding Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents. Rubenstein is patent expert reviewing the patents for patentability.

1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer letter regarding Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents.

1999 09 20 Meeting with Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Brian Utley, Steven Filipek of Fish & Richardson PC. The meeting was in New York at Rubenstein's Office, yet Rubenstein denies even knowing us other than to refer Joao in his deposition. Filipek had questions regarding the patents he viewed, claiming they appeared to miss the invention.

Posted here by
Investigative Blogger

Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com