Showing posts with label Ruth M. Pollack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ruth M. Pollack. Show all posts

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Barclays Capital - Davis Polk & Wardwell - Leslie Anderson - Ruth M. Pollack

So Barclay Capital New York, New York is Researching "George Demos and Ethics, - "Ruth M. Pollack" - Leslie Anderson - "davis polk and leak" and "august 2010 crystal cox" ...

So What Connects These Folks.. ???

What Does Davis Polk & Wardwell, George Demos and New York Grievance Commitee Leslie Anderson have in Common? I mean It Seems that Lehman Brother's Money is in there somewhere.. and well where Does Ruth M. Pollack Fit into all this.

Seems like Bank of America and Wachovia are in the mix as well with Deep Internet Searches and Well who is Searching What on Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox's Whistleblower Blogs. And why does Barclay Capital in Big Ol' New York City care about the search term "august 2010 crystal cox"? I feel so Special...

Davis Polk & Wardwell and Barclay Capital Connections

One Barclays Capital and Davis Polk & Wardwell Connection is Show-Mao Chen is a Partner of Davis Polk & Wardwell's Corporate and it seems to me that This "Equity" Relationship has many secrets that have yet to meet the public eye.
http://www.iflr1000.com/JurisdictionFirm/789/9/Davis-Polk--Wardwell.html#Jurisdiction60
Do you have a Tip on the Connection, or Back Alley Deals "Possibly" between Show-Mao Chen and Barclay Capital ? If so Email your Tip to Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Barclays Capital interested in this Link
http://www.industrywhistleblower.com/2010/07/secs-revolving-door-forbes-looking-into.html
Which is about Davis Polk Attorneys and SEC Attorney Corruption.

Barclays Capital Searches "Davis Polk and Leak" - So does this Mysterious Barclays Capital Googlier think that a Mystery Leak from Davis Polk & Wardwell will just show up in the Search Engines? Hmmm. .what is Barclays Capital Really Looking for ? This "Davis Polk and Leak" was Searched July 1st by Barclay's Capital.

Here is a Barclays Capital Connection to Banc of America, Wachovia, and Davis Polk & Wardwell.

"Significant Events: From Bankruptcy to Debt Offerings - June 2009"

""Comcast Corp. issued $1.5 billion in notes, aimed at bolstering the company’s working capital. Banc of America Securities, Barclay’s Capital, BNP, and Wachovia are joint book-running managers. Davis Polk & Wardwell is passing on the validity of the securities to Comcast. Cahill Gordon & Reindell represents the underwriters. ""

Source of Above Post on Davis Polk & Wardwell and Barclay Capital Connection
http://currents.westlawbusiness.com/Articles/2009/07/20090725_0005.aspx?cid=&src=

Oh and Don't Forget the Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom Connections to Davis Polk & Wardwell which Connects Judith Kaye Ex-Supreme Court Judge and Proskauer Rose Crony to all this.. SO Looks to Me like Hundreds and Hundreds of Billions of Dollars at Play and well... Secrets are Swirling Up out of New York Like a Shit Storm of Tornados.. but Hey What Do I Know.. I am just Some Blogger.. oh and you Know My Motto.. all Roads to Corruption .. All Roads to Hell Start with Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

Barclay Capital and Connections to George Demos and Leslie Anderson.

So How is Barclays Capital Connected to Leslie Anderson of the New York Grievance Committee ? Well it Seems that Barclays Capital was Searching for Information on the Ethics of George Demos, Which Of Course We know is a now infamous Oxy Moron as George Demos has NO Ethics. Anyway Barclay Capital stumbled on this post

http://www.industrywhistleblower.com/2010/08/leslie-anderson-grievance-committee-new.html
and well they ate it up.. Hmmm...

So What Does Barclay Capital have to Do with George Demos?

Ok So We Have Companies worth Hundreds of Billions of Dollars, We have the Infamous Asshole George Demos who ratted out Whistleblower Peter Sivere .. we have Leslie B. Anderson of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth District in New York who seems to be Rita Adler's Go To Gal.. and well Seems to be overlooking the Crimes of George Demos for Some Reason???

Ok then we have Davis Polk & Wardwell which is another Multi-Billion Dollar Connection and I believe one of the Corrupt Law firms involved in the Iviewit Stolen Patent..

Ok so there you have it. .Money .. Corruption. Cover ups.. Politics .. SEC Crimes.. Whistleblowers.. oh then Wait. .Who the Hell is Ruth M. Pollack and Why is the Barclays Capital Googlier Googling Ruth M. Pollack?

Well Let's See I have done a few posts about the Corruption in the New York Grievance Committee for the Tenth District, and Well I have written on Leslie Anderson and On Rita Adler as the Turn a Blind Eye to Corruption among the Elite New York Attorneys and Protect Assholes like George Demos as they take down Good Guys like Peter Sivere and well. .. .hmmm. Ruth Pollack, what does that have to do with any of this?

Well maybe the Mysterious Barclay's Capital Googlier is trying to research the Incredible Cover Ups and Corruption under the guidance of Rita E. Adler Chief Counselor of the New York Grievance Committee and they stumbled on documents where Rita Adler as well as Leslie Anderson are somehow in on the Corrupt, without Merit Disbarring of New York Attorney Ruth Pollack.

Thing is from the seat I have in this Wall of Corruption Game coming out of New York .. and the Billionaire Law Firms, Hedge Funds, Investment Companies, and well the New York Politicians and Grievance Committees that protect them .. all this Money and Motive.. well from where I sit I just don't get what one Small, Independent New York Attorney has to do with any of this..

I mean why did the New York Bar in all their "High Standards" and Laughable Ethics.. why did they Disbar an Honest, Ethical Independent New York Attorney?

Well from all I have written on and information I have received over the last year... my guess would be that this Nobody of an Attorney knows something that she shouldn't know.. or at least some Big Dog somewhere thinks she knows some dirty deed or back alley secret..

So Barclays Capital in New York.. What are You Really Up TO and what does it have to do with Me.. with Ruth Pollack and will Davis Polk and Wardwell... ???

Where does "august 2010 crystal cox" come into the mind of the Barclays Capital Googlier.. what does "august 2010 crystal cox" have to do with any of this ?

Hmmmm....

See Some Connections that I Don't ...??

Oh I know you Do..
So eMail me Your Whistleblower Tip
at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

New York Second Department is Certainly
a Judicial Hell Hole from Where I am Sitting..

Note To Post: Folks ALL Links I post, if you Like the Site Copy the Page, Print it. .THEY Change.. when Attention is brought to them .. they tend to change the information so.. make a copy.. DO NOT assume the Page .. the "News" will stay the Same. .I mean Facts are . .Well .. Ya know.. Interchangeable..

Friday, April 9, 2010

Jame E. Pelzer - Second Department - New York Reported to Be Issuing Unethical and UnLawful Suspensions on Lawful Ethical New York Attorneys

In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack - James Edward Pelzer

Sources say that Ruth M. Pollack was Illegally and Unethical Suspended as a New York Attorney, her Civil Rights have been violated and sources say that she is not taking it laying down.

So the question .... is James Pelzer - Clerk of Court handing out Attorney Suspensions for Political Favors, Pay Offs, OR are they actually based in Law, Truth and What Really Happened?
Does James Edward Pelzer have to Prove that an Attorney actually committed a crime or did something unlawful or does James E. Pelzer just hand out suspensions like candy...???

See in New York.. My Whistleblower Network talks about an incredible, historic Wall of Corruption.. it is said that Attorneys all know each other and they are above the Law. So the Big Law Firms are protected to committ Billion Dollar Crimes and no one seems to have the Moxy to hold them accountable for anything...

I am seeing in Court Corruption across the United States in Big and Small Courts, that the Law is irrelevant and that the Truth is No Defense. However, the law is forced, faked, staged to set up those who know to much, or speak out against corruption or injustice.. it happens the same in small towns and the biggest of cities... the Game is the Same... easily set up the "Good Guy" for a Text Message, a Faked Incident.. and well you would be shocked.. this to run them out of business and bring the Ol' Economic Terrorism, take their livelihood - take their credibility and ruin their life all to protect some unethical behavior that some Well Connected Attorney or Politician has done... it is Wrong Folks.. Flat out Wrong..

Those of you Who Follow My Blogs.. know that .. it is simple.. the Truth is Criminal.. and the courts, the clerks and corrupt attorneys will make sure you go down for it.. that simple.. I have now seen it over and over again..

Below is a Suspension Letter to New York Attorney Ruth M. Pollack, I found it online.. it is My Opinion that this Letter from James E. Pelzer is Illegal, Not Based in Fact, Not Based in Truth, Not Based in Law and that this Letter is a Civil Violation of Ruth Pollack's Rights.

Stay Tuned to Our Blog Network for More on the Ruth M. Pollack Story, as we uncover More TRUTH out of the Second Departmet - www.SecondDepartment.com

Got a Tip
Email Me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com


"" In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack, admitted
as Ruth Marie Pollack, an attorney and
counselor-at-law.

Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, petitioner;
Ruth M. Pollack, respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 1892660)

By letter dated January 27, 2009, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial
District
informed the court that the respondent was convicted on September 26, 2008, of criminal contempt pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure rule 42 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York.

She was sentenced by the Honorable Allyne R. Ross to unsupervised probation for a period of two years and suspended from the practice of law in the Eastern District of New York for a period of 45 days.

The Grievance Committee submitted certified copies of the judgment dated September 26, 2008, the memorandum and verdict dated September 19, 2008, and the sentencing minutes dated September 26, 2008, and took the position that the respondent’s conviction qualifies as a serious crime within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90(4)(d) and 22 NYCRR 691.7(b). Notwithstanding that order of suspension, the respondent continued to practice law in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York.

Accordingly, by order dated December 31, 2008, the Committee on Grievances for the Eastern District of New York suspended the respondent from the practice of law before that court for a period of two years.

The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District also submitted a certified copy of that order to the court and served the respondent with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 informing her of her right to file a verified statement setting forth defenses to the imposition of reciprocal discipline.

The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on October 26, 1983, under the name Ruth Marie Pollack.

Upon the papers submitted to the court, it is ORDERED that on the court’s own motion, the respondent Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, is immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(f) as a result of her conviction of a serious crime, continuing until further order of this court;

and it is further, ORDERED that the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, shall promptly comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, during the period of suspension and
until further order of this court, the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, is commanded to desist and refrain from

(1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another,

(2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority,

(3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and

(4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth
Judicial District is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court, as petitioner, against the said Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, based on her conviction of a serious crime; and it is further,

ORDERED that Rita E. Adler, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, 150 Motor Parkway, Suite 102, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding; and it is further,

ORDERED that the petitioner Grievance Committee shall serve upon the respondent and the Special Referee and file with this court a petition within 30 days after receipt of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent shall serve an answer to the petition upon the petitioner and the Special Referee and file the original answer with this court within 20 days after service upon her of the petition; and it is further,

ORDERED that the issues raised by the petition and any answer thereto are referred
to the Honorable James A. Gowan, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, 90 Sequams Lane East, West Islip, N.Y. 11795, as Special Referee to expeditiously hear and report, together with his findings on the issues, and to submit a report within 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing or the submission of post-hearing memoranda; and it is further,

ORDERED that if the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack,
has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in her affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(f); and it is further,

ORDERED that the Grievance Committee’s application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3
to impose reciprocal discipline upon the respondent is denied as academic.

PRUDENTI, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SPOLZINO and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court ""

Source of Post
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/calendar/webcal/motions/2009/M88523.pdf

Do you have a Tip on Jame E. Pelzer ?

We are getting information on James Edward Pelzer - Clerk of the Court - Second Judicial Department - Appellate Division ... it is said that Jame E. Pelzer is possibly... simply handing out suspensions as the one above without approval, not based in law or fact but instead based on the New York Attorney Fraternity and the Culture of Corruption that we hear so much about out of New York - Especially the "Second Department.

If you have any Knowledge of Possible Unethical or Corrupt actions from or by James Edward Pelzer - Please Email your Whistleblower Tip to me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

More Facts and the TRUTH about Ruth M. Pollack Coming Soon to my New Investigative Blog - www.SecondDepartment.com

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Labels

Crystal Cox - Investigative Blogger

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

  © Blogger template 'Grease' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP